Archive for Thu, 21 Dec 2006...
Eschaton
Mahablog Demagogue Margaret Cho ArchPundit FaBlog Alas, a Blog Talking Dog General J.C. Christian Dohiyimir Needle Nose Crooked Timber GOTV The American Street World O'Crap Looking Glass Julian Sanchez Gene Healy Fafblog Whiskey Fire Bria
(close)Sources linking to this item (24):
- Democrat Taylor Marsh Blogs Politics: ... You can fnd him here for now. Evidently, an upgrade that was supposed to be quick is now a marathon experience. Hang in there, ...
- Making Light: ... multiple-choice tests. More... PNH's Sidelights * Atrios's usual site is down; go here instead * ...
- First Draft: ... Atrios' Eschaton here: http://eschaton08.blogspot.com/ . ...
- Crooks and Liars: ... can be found in blogger purgatory, Here's his temporary site . Well, spread the word that we're here for now. Blogger kept tempting me to switch to their new version, telling me it would only take a couple of minutes or maybe a little bit longer…that was 16 hours ...
- Think Progress: ... your Atrios fix. His main site is down right now. Check out his temporary site HERE . 9:39 am | Comment (11) Filed ...
- Rising Hegemon: ... There is a grey turtleneck sighting here. ...
- The Mahablog: ... — maha @ 11:02 am If you are wondering what happened to Eschaton — it’s here . Comments ...
- Discourse.net: On the fringes of the public sphere: ... Atrios Junkies Eschaton has been bloggered, so if you want your Atrios fix you will need to visit the temporary Eschaton site until this gets sorted out. It's sort of interesting how "I've been Bloggered" is the '00s version of the early 90s "I've been Continentaled". It can't be good when your brand is commonly associated with ...
- Jesus' General: ... December 21, 2006 Looking for Lafayette? " Atrios's temporary home is here . I'm going to be making the same changeover tomorrow night. I hope it goes a little better for me. posted by Gen. JC Christian, Patriot ...
- Talking Points Memo: by Joshua Micah Marshall: ... 21, 2006 -- 10:51 AM EST // link) Missing Atrios? Here's his temporary URL until the main one gets fixed. -- Josh Marshall (December 21, 2006 -- 08:52 AM EST ...
- THE NEWS BLOG: ... Atrios's new temporary location http://eschaton08.blogspot.com A Larger Military? Warm Bodies and Duty Descriptions One of IAVA's most thoughtful members ...
- Unclaimed Territory - by Glenn Greenwald: ... * * * * * * * * Atrios, whose blog has been down ever since he was hoodwinked by Blogspot into accepting the "quick, easy and painless" upgrade they have been offering (which I have been steadfastly resisting), is blogging temporarily here . posted by Glenn Greenwald ...
- CorrenteWire | Ecrasez l'infame!: ... I went to Atrios this morning, and got the very same message! I guess the notion of “a little while” is a wee bit elastic. “Push button publishing”? Sure, except you have to keep pushing the button… UPDATE Atrios is now back up at a temporary location, eschaton08.blogspot.com, but the old URL, atrios.blogspot.com still doesn’t work. A humongous international multi-billion-dollar corporation can’t be expected to think of everything, ...
- PSoTD -: ... December 21, 2006 at 11:26am Looking for Atrios? He's a victim of Bloggerineptiatitis . Posted by PSoTD Posted on Thursday December 21, 2006 at 11:26am | Permalink ...
- GOTV: ... withdrawal? Eschaton has temporary address. posted by Alice Marshall ...
- skippy the bush kangaroo: ... not there. he's here. addendum: no, he's not there either, he's back here now . posted by skippy ...
- 0: ... you're missing your hourly Eschaton fix... Blogger has put Atrios in the penalty box. Read him here temporarily. posted by Nitpicker ...
- Dohiyi Mir: ... fuck up a migration to a "new and improved" platform so that a major blog like Eschaton is down for a entire day (and counting). It's almost like Donald Rumsfeld planned it. Blogging is untidy. ntodd [Update: refugee camp established by the UN .] December 21, 9:32 AM | Permalink | Comments (11) ...
- The Stakeholder :: Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee: ... Posted by jesselee Thursday, December 21, 2006 at 10:54 AM Hiding nyah... Link to this entry | Feedback (0) ...
- SW's Energy Gap: ... Gateway Drug to Left Blogostan Thursday, December 21, 2006 Eschaton Eschaton : "Since my blogging days began we've been treated to various rounds of 'WHY AREN'T LIBERAL BLOGGERS SUPPORTING IRANIAN STUDENT PROTESTERS.' " My take on this is different than Duncan's. I believe that in opposing the Bush ...
- Suburban Guerrilla: ... ( at 12:35 pm) For the time being, you can find Atrios here . UPDATE: Never mind, he’s fixed now. Permalink ...
- Balloon Juice: ... 21, 2006 at 11:11 am Atrios is posting here while he works out blogger problems. Filed under: Blogospheric Navel-Gazing ...
- rubber hose: ... atrios is posting here while eschaton is down. ...and the original site is ...
- Hullabaloo: ... New posts below (hopefully) and you can get your necessary Atrios fix at http://eschaton08.blogspot.com/ temporarily because blogger is, unsurprisingly, bloggered. Fixed! Dear Santa by digby Last year I asked my readers to put a little change in the kitty if they had it to ...
U.S. Not Winning War in Iraq, Bush Says for 1st Time
President Bush acknowledged for the first time yesterday that the United States is not winning the war in Iraq and said he plans to expand the overall size of the "stressed" U.S. armed forces to meet the challenges of a long-term global struggle against terrorists.
(close)Sources linking to this item (21):
- Wonkette: The D.C. Gossip: ... Briefing: That's What She Said President Bush says he plans for the military to stick with the “bigger is better” plan. [ WP , ...
- BuzzFlash - Daily Headlines and Breaking News: ... Award Winner: Darby upheld a higher ethical benchmark than Rumsfeld, Cheney or Bush. "We're Americans, we're not Saddam," Darby said. "We hold ourselves to a higher standard." The Man Needs to be Hauled Before a Grand Jury, After Receiving Appropriate Mental Health Treatment. Today's Gem from the Man Who Lets Other Die for His Stubborn Vanity: "U.S. Not Winning War in Iraq, Bush Says for 1st Time." 12/20 Busheviks Force ...
- AMERICAblog: A blog for a great nation that deserves the truth: ... They have no clue about Iraq, just campaign slogans. The President claims he is working on "the new way forward" for Iraq. Note to the Prez: There is no new way forward, only a way out. Should be fun to watch him squirm about his comment to the Wash. Post that we're not winning in Iraq. As soon as you hear Bush say he wants to work in a bi-partisan manner, you'll know nothing else he says is true. If you're watching -- and even if you're not -- comment away. Okay, ...
- Shakespeare's Sister: ... they're making is worth it. And they need to know from the commander in chief: Not only is it worth it, but I strongly support them and believe that their work will lead to victory. That's what I believe. Believe it? To review there is a plan to have a strategy or a strategy to have a plan that will lead to a victory, a victory that follows a mission that was accomplished, before we ...
- Salon.com - Daou Report: ... OF WAR “We’re not winning, we’re not losing” I actually find that statement to be pretty accurate. The current situation may seem intolerable to some but we’re nowhere near losing. We also haven’t acted with the military and political firmness needed to ensure victory: President Bush acknowledged for the ...
- The Obfuscation Report: ... Bush Said Kerry Proposal to Increase Size of Military Would Make The Country ‘Less Safe’ Yesterday, President Bush announced his intention to increase the “overall size” of the Army , acknowledging that the current forces were “stressed.” The Washington Post reports he’s considering an increase of 50,000-70,000 troops. On June 3, 2004, Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) — campaigning for the presidency — ...
- The Democratic Daily: ... the troop strength of the Army and Marine Corps, heeding warnings from the Pentagon and Capitol Hill that multiple deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan are stretching the armed forces toward the breaking point.” “ We need to reset our military,” said Bush, whose administration had opposed increasing force levels as recently as this summer. But in a wide-ranging session in the Oval Office, the president said he interpreted the Democratic election victories six ...
- Uncommon Thought Journal: ... at Ground Zero 12/20/06 Pincus, WP, Lawmaker Opposes More Troops for Baghdad 12/20/06 Baker, WP, U.S. Not Winning War in Iraq, Bush Says for 1st Time 12/20/06 McConnell, CSM, Climate change clash in Africa 12/20/06 Miks, ...
- Dem Bloggers: ... a plan to increase the troop strength of the Army and Marine Corps, heeding warnings from the Pentagon and Capitol Hill that multiple deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan are stretching the armed forces toward the breaking point." " We need to reset our military," said Bush, whose administration had opposed increasing force levels as recently as this summer. But in a wide-ranging session in the Oval Office, the president said he interpreted the Democratic election victories six weeks ago ...
- Candide's Notebooks: ... stuff that got him addicted in the first place. If we have a military crisis, the solution is to militarize further, and march ever closer to a draft. Feed the machinery of war. It’s insanity by any other name. [Washington Post] Defying commanders, Bush to increase troops in Iraq [The ...
- Norwegianity: ... -- the Army, the Marines," he said. "And I talked about this to Secretary Gates, and he is going to spend some time talking to the folks in the building, come back with a recommendation to me about how to proceed forward on this idea." [ Peter Baker, Washington Post ] Lyingest liar? or most clueless bastard of all time? Sean Penn, the actor and occasional foreign correspondent for the San Francisco Chronicle, hit the media and called for impeachment of the ...
- Think Progress: ... Make The Country ‘Less Safe’ Yesterday, President Bush announced his intention to of the Army , acknowledging that the current forces were “stressed.” The Washington Post reports he’s considering an increase of 50,000-70,000 troops. On June 3, 2004, Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) — campaigning for the presidency ...
- Perrspectives: Blog: ... playing the game very well. "I believe that we're going to win." President Bush, December 20, 2006. "We're not winning, we're not losing." President Bush, December 19, 2006 . "Absolutely, we're winning." President Bush, October 25, 2006. "We are losing." Former Bush Secretary of State Colin ...
- Firedoglake - Firedoglake weblog: ... steps you plan on taking to achieve them? More than three years after starting this mess in Iraq, can you give the American public any idea — any at all — as to when we plan on starting down that "path"? Since ve started saying that we need to expand the military (and, btw, how do we plan on doing that in a voluntary military when we are barely meeting recruiting goals now?), what exactly are the plans going to be since we'll be exposing even more young Americans to bullets and IEDs and such in Iraq and ...
- :: BlackElectorate.com ::: ... Michael Bloomberg, or they lash out in anger like Michael Richards." Washington Post: U.S. Not Winning War in Iraq, Bush Says for 1st Time. President Plans to Expand Army, Marine Corps to Cope With Strain of Multiple Deployments. Houston Chronicle: Ordered last month to restore housing ...
- Alternate Brain: ... to this post ] - U.S. Not Winning War in Iraq, Bush Says for 1st Time WaPo President Bush acknowledged for the first time yesterday that the United States is not winning the war in Iraq and said he plans to expand the overall size of the "stressed" U.S. armed forces to meet the challenges of a ...
- The Democratic Party: ... PM | Comments (2) Looking Back What ThinkProgress said: Yesterday, President Bush announced his intention to increase the “overall size” of the Army , acknowledging that the current forces were “stressed.” The Washington Post reports he’s considering an increase of 50,000-70,000 troops. On June 3, 2004, Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) — campaigning for the presidency — ...
- JABBS: ... Bush said yesterday that he is considering a short-term surge in troops in Iraq, an option that top generals have resisted. Among the options under review by the White House ...
- MotherJones.com | MoJo Blog - Social Issues and Political Commentary: ... lives and moved backwards over that time (see graphic on left side at this link), to the point where, amazingly, the most stubborn-minded segments of American society are admitting we're not winning. Even in an administration where accountability doesn't exist, those responsible for failure sometimes leave on their ...
- Shining Light In Dark Corners: ... Gates Begins Intense Talks on War Efforts (washingtonpost.com - World News and Analysis From The Washington Post) U.S. Not Winning War in Iraq, Bush Says for 1st Time (washingtonpost.com - World News and Analysis From The Washington Post) China Tightens Adoption Rules for ...
- Oh Well: A Commentary on News and Politics: ... here. In an interview with the Washington Post, Bush actually said that the U.S. was not winning the war in Iraq. Here's the quote through the WaPost interview: President Bush acknowledged for the first time yesterday that the United States is not winning the war in Iraq and said he plans to expand the overall size of the "stressed" U.S. armed forces to meet the challenges of a ...
Secrets to Be Declassified Under New Rule at Age 25
At midnight on Dec. 31, hundreds of millions of pages of secret documents will be declassified.
(close)Sources linking to this item (11):
- Newsfare: ... Frees Holocaust Denier From Jail Secrets at Age 25 ...
- BuzzFlash - Daily Headlines and Breaking News: ... Could be a Greater Gift for the Greater Good Than Fair Trade Chocolate and Other Food Products That Benefit Workers Throughout the World, Including in the United States. At midnight on Dec. 31, hundreds of millions of pages of secret documents will be instantly declassified, including many F.B.I. cold war files on investigations of people suspected of being Communist sympathizers. 12/21 ...
- Defense Tech: ... recent history -- is going to let hundreds of millions of once-classified documents enter into the public sphere . Secret documents 25 years old or older will lose their ...
- Think Progress: ... of pages of secret documents that are 25 years old or older will be instantly declassified. “After years of extensions sought by federal agencies behaving like college students facing a term paper, the end of 2006 means the government’s first automatic declassification of records .” 10:13 am | Comment ...
- Prometheus 6 | All respect and no restraint: ... long it lasts Submitted by Prometheus 6 on December 21, 2006 - 9:04am. on People of the Word U.S. to Declassify Secrets at Age 25 By SCOTT SHANE WASHINGTON, Dec. 20 — It will be a Cinderella moment for the band of researchers who study the hidden history of American government. At midnight on Dec. 31, hundreds of millions of pages of secret ...
- The Huffington Post: ... AP Secret Government Documents 25 Years Or Older To Be Declassified On New Year's Day... QUIC ...
- The Blue State: ... that I come across. Some of it might be kind of random. But I think you all can tolerate it: At midnight on December 31st, the FBI will declassify "hundreds of millions of pages of secret documents," according to the New York Times . Some of the information will include the notes on Americans that were suspected of being communist sympathizers. This will only apply to documents 25 years or older. President ...
- Wonkette: The D.C. Gossip: ... about the gays. [WP] First big wave of declassified documents to hit January 1st, impact on the conspiracy theory community still unknown. [ NYT ] Yes, Sandy Berger is that “ham-handed and comical.” ...
- Alternate Brain: ... to this post ] - Automatic Declassification NYTimes It will be a Cinderella moment for the band of researchers who study the hidden history of American government. At midnight on Dec. 31, hundreds of millions of pages of secret documents will be instantly ...
- Cursor.org - Table of Contents page: ... 1 in 2006' -- but not in Geov Parrish's list of 'The Year's Most Overhyped Stories.' As a " Cinderella moment " approaches, the FBI reveals that "John Winston ...
- Norwegianity: ... had expected President Bush to scrap the deadline. His administration has overseen the reclassification of many historical files and restricted access to presidential papers of past administrations, as well as contemporary records. [ Scott Shane, New York Times ] No surprise, really. This first batch of documents has the potential to embarrass Bush I and Reagan. I don't think Prince George would mind that too ...
U.S. Not Winning War in Iraq, Bush Says for 1st Time
President Bush acknowledged for the first time yesterday that the United States is not winning the war in Iraq and said he plans to expand the overall size of the "stressed" U.S. armed forces to meet the challenges of a long-term global struggle against terrorists.
(close)Sources linking to this item (45):
- The Blue State: ... America's military is stretched to almost a breaking point -- an opinion shared by Colin Powell -- President Bush has decided to expand the size of the U.S. military, as reported in an exclusive interview with the Washington Post: "I'm inclined to believe that we do need to increase our troops -- the Army, the Marines," Bush said in the Oval ...
- Oliver Willis: Like Kryptonite To Stupid: ... Not The Size Leave it to a car wreck of a President like George Bush to look at the current world situation and decide that it isn't his poorly thought out and executed policies that are at fault, but that the real source of it all is the military not being big enough . Look, if the U.S. military wasn't busy babysitting Iraq and trying to build a brand new nation that was never there while getting killed - there would be no military stretched thin. In fact, we'd be ahead in the global fight against terror ...
- The Huffington Post: ... AP Bush: “We Do Need To Increase Our Troops”… QUICK ...
- Hullabaloo: ... Period. And it isn't going to happen because 70% of the country have wised up to the fact that this pony hunt is making the country less safe and it's costing us our future. According to the WaPo this afternoon: In an interview with The Washington Post, Bush said he has instructed newly sworn-in Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates to report back to him with a plan to increase ground forces. The president gave no estimates about how ...
- The Left Coaster: ... House Armed Services Chairman Ike Skelton (D) Both the Post and ABC News are reporting at this hour that Bush will deflect the “surge” problem he faces in Iraq by shifting the subject to growing the size of the military to combat terrorism . Fine. Here are several questions for the Decider: 1. Before we add troops to the active forces to fight terrorism, how many troops will you redeploy from police duty inside Iraq’s civil war? 2. Which tax cuts for the wealthy ...
- Adventus: ... its not all about the denari, ya know. left rev. What does this mean? President Bush said today that he plans to expand the size of the U.S. military to meet the challenges of a long-term global war against terrorists, a response to warnings that sustained deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan ...
- RealClearPolitics: ... House Bush to Expand Size of Military ...
- Bark Bark Woof Woof: ... it seems like we've stretched our military to the breaking point by invading one little country that greeted us as liberators. From the Washington Post :President Bush said today that he plans to expand the size of the U.S. military to meet the challenges of a long-term global war against terrorists, a response to warnings that sustained deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan have ...
- Hoffmania! | All That's Left! Liberal News & Free Speech: ... Okay. Put Jenna and Barbara At The Front Of The Line Otherwise, shut your goddamned steakhole and end this thing . Stop trying to pile more bodies on to your massive failure. President Bush said today that he plans to expand the size of the U.S. military to meet the challenges of a long-term global war against terrorists, a response to ...
- Talking Points Memo: by Joshua Micah Marshall: ... 20, 2006 -- 12:26 AM EST // link) In a front page story in Wednesday's Post, President Bush makes major news by moving from a completely delusional to a semi-delusional stance on the progress of the War in Iraq. Says Bush, In Iraq, "we're not winning, we're not losing." Bush ...
- First Draft: ... the other hand he said we're not losing... "We're not winning, we're not losing," Bush said in an interview with The Washington Post. The assessment was a striking reversal for a president who, days before the November elections, declared, "Absolutely, we're winning." Bush also disclosed he has ordered DoD Secretary Gates to "develop a plan to increase the troop ...
- Media Needle: ... George Bush We may need to bring back the draft. posted by Morse at 6:03 ...
- War and Piece: ... sad to read. ... " Posted by Laura at 05:28 PM WP : Bush to expand size of military. Posted by Laura at 05:20 ...
- Liberty Street: ... global war on terror Today's WaPo has an article titled " Bush to Expand Size of Military ": President Bush said today that he plans to expand the size of the U.S. military to meet the challenges of a long-term global war against terrorists, a response to warnings that sustained deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan ...
- Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines: ... Bush has instructed Defense Secretary Robert Gates to provide a plan for increasing the size of the Army and Marine Corps. A major increase would take years to achieve and would not alleviate problems associated with the White House’s plan to “surge” troop levels in ...
- Bush Watch Home: ... Washington Post's Eugene Robinson wrote, "The modest increase now on the table would be purposeless and wrong. What could be more immoral than sacrificing American blood and treasure to save face in a lost war?" Bush to Expand Size of Military , Peter Baker "President Bush said today that he plans to expand the size of the U.S. military to meet the challenges of a long-term global war against terrorists, a response to warnings that sustained deployments in Iraq and ...
- Prometheus 6 | All respect and no restraint: ... by Prometheus 6 on December 19, 2006 - 8:36pm. on War That's the only way this works. Bush to Expand Size of Military By Peter Baker Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, December 19, 2006; 4:18 PM President Bush said today that he plans to expand the size of the U.S. military to meet the challenges of a long-term global war against ...
- Bush Watch Home: ... Washington Post's Eugene Robinson wrote, "The modest increase now on the table would be purposeless and wrong. What could be more immoral than sacrificing American blood and treasure to save face in a lost war?" Bush to Expand Size of Military , Peter Baker "President Bush said today that he plans to expand the size of the U.S. military to meet the challenges of a long-term global war against terrorists, a response to warnings that sustained deployments in Iraq and ...
- The Reaction -- by Michael J.W. Stickings: ... Michael J.W. Stickings Sure, Mr. President. That's the latest spin , I understand, and it beats the "we're winning" nonsense that you spewed before the midterms, but only your most delusional supporters believe you now. I think I'll take ...
- The Moderate Voice - -: ... Michael van der Galien The WaPo reports that U.S. President George W. Bush plans to expand the size of the army. Why, one might ask. Well, Bush II has - for the first time - said that the U.S. is not winning in Iraq. He believes that the U.S. military should be bigger to cope with the ...
- The Democratic Daily: ... substantial military expansion will take years and would not immediately affect the war in Iraq.” And Baker also pointed out that “Democrats have been calling for additional troops for years.” Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) proposed an increase of 40,000 troops during his 2004 campaign against Bush, only to be dismissed by the administration. As recently as June, the Bush administration opposed adding more troops because restructuring “is enabling our military ...
- Article 19: ... December 20, 2006 Now He Tells Us Bush on Iraq: " We're not winning ." I wonder if he'll ever see that the problem is not that we're losing in Iraq. The problem is that he persists in viewing this complex chaotic situation in terms of America winning or losing, ...
- The Raw Story | A rational voice - Alternative news: ... Department 'reviewing own role' in NSA wiretaps President to seek larger US military ...
- Brains and Eggs: ... field at each of those locations)-- worked hard, but the blue wave was turned back by the Texas red levee again. Perhaps some of these conservatives can be dispatched to New Orleans to help with flood control. That is, if they don't choose to help serve their President in Iraq . -- Judith Regan, the book publisher who green-lighted OJ Simpson's "If I Did It", was fired by HarperCollins over the weekend. You may recall her ...
- Salon.com - Daou Report: ... The Crawford Kid - A larger more effective force President Bush announced new plans for a larger and more effective military.... I was “boots on the ground” during the last reshaping and refitting of the military during the Reagan years - which was necessary because of the decimation of the Carter years. Consequently, ...
- The Mahablog: ... picture stuff — maha @ 11:00 am This morning I read the first paragraph of Washington Post : President Bush acknowledged for the first time yesterday that the United States is not winning the war in Iraq and said he plans to expand the overall size of the “stressed” U.S. armed forces to meet the challenges ...
- Shakespeare's Sister: ... posted by Shakespeare's Sister | Wednesday, December 20, 2006 | permalink | You and what army? Bush said he has ordered Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates to develop a plan to increase the troop strength of the Army and Marine Corps, heeding warnings from the Pentagon and Capitol Hill that multiple deployments in Iraq ...
- My Left Wing :: A Liberal Translation: ... ePluribus. Also at Kos. It appears the Great Decider has decided to go big and long. As Peter Baker of the Washington Post reports, Mr. Bush is considering a troop surge in Iraq, and to increase the size of the Army and Marine Corps by as many as 70,000 troops. The Army says every additional 10,000 troops will cost roughly $1.2 billion per year. Since ...
- Taegan Goddard's Political Wire: ... Quote of the Day "We're not winning, we're not losing." -- President Bush, quoted by the Washington Post , on the situation in Iraq. In early November, Bush declared "Absolutely, we're ...
- ePluribus Media Community || Collaborative Media for the Masses: ... Left Wing. Also at Kos. It appears the Great Decider has decided to go big and long. As Peter Baker of the Washington Post reports, Mr. Bush is considering a troop surge in Iraq, and to increase the size of the Army and Marine Corps by as many as 70,000 troops. The Army says every additional 10,000 troops will cost roughly $1.2 billion per year. Since ...
- Tennessee Guerilla Women: ... results. According to the Commander-in-the-Bubble, when the American people voted for the Democrats, they were telling Bush to spend more money, send more troops, do whatever it takes to achieve victory or win the War on Iraq! But in a wide-ranging session in the Oval Office, the president said he interpreted the Democratic election victories six weeks ago not as a mandate to bring the U.S. involvement in Iraq to an end but as a call to ...
- Dem Bloggers: ... for the WaPo on the interview noted that "A substantial military expansion will take years and would not immediately affect the war in Iraq." And Baker also pointed out that "Democrats have been calling for additional troops for years." Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) proposed an increase of 40,000 troops during his 2004 campaign against Bush, only to be dismissed by the administration. As recently as June, the Bush administration opposed adding more troops because restructuring "is enabling our military to get ...
- Today in Iraq: ... this to Secretary Gates and he is going to spend some time talking to the folks in the building, come back with a recommendation to me about how to proceed forward on this idea." Put it on your kid’s credit card : A force structure expansion would accelerate the already-rising costs of war. The administration is drafting a supplemental request for more than $100 billion in additional funds for the wars in ...
- D-Day: ... Eric Boehlert points out, one bad story wouldn't disqualify the documented, provable hundreds and thousands of deaths and violent acts occurring in Iraq on a continuous basis, so much so that the President has to go ahead and say "we're not winning," and the war's chief apologist, the guy that put "we're winning" on the cover of the National Review, writes something like ...
- TAPPED: ... (0) THE ARMY AFTER IRAQ. The president's plan to expand the military , particularly the Army, reminds me of a discussion I participated in last week at the Naval War College. When the United States finally withdraws from Iraq (whether in 2009 or 2012 or 2015), what's going to happen to the Army? In spite of the ...
- CorrenteWire | Ecrasez l'infame!: ... way too big, and a danger to its own country and the rest of the world, how would you go about reducing it, or at least its effectiveness in imposing imperialism? It was by all measures and estimations the most indominable force ever assembled… but now? President Bush acknowledged for the first time yesterday that the United States is not winning the war in Iraq and said he plans to expand the overall size of the “stressed” U.S. armed forces to meet the challenges of ...
- rubber hose: ... December 20, 2006 endgame bush admitted for the first time yesterday that we are not winning the war in iraq. this morning he adopted a proposal he previously said would make the country less safe when john kerry ...
- Crooks and Liars: ... today's Presser, Bush trys to explain his statement from the day before: " re not losing …" Video-WMP Video-QT (rough ...
- The Carpetbagger Report: ... strikes me as rather unfortunate that we’ve reached a point in which it’s literally front-page news when the president is willing to acknowledge that we are not winning the war in Iraq. Talk about your soft bigotry of low expectations. Indeed, it’s now considered progress when Bush dodges the question. ...
- Intrepid Liberal Journal: ... election night in 2004 lying has not served President Bush well. In a desperate quest to salvage his toxic legacy the President finally admitted we're not winning in Iraq as a pretext to deploy more troops and "strengthen" our military. Mr. President you are three years too late. Dispatching more troops will only result in more soldiers dying for a lost and immoral cause. Sadly the only realistic option is ...
- The Psychotic Patriot: ... So now he's on the fence. Soon we'll hear Tony Snow be all... "Hey, we've never said we're winning." One thing you can count on, is that while people are dying in Iraq, control of the language is the only mission ...
- 2Millionth Web Log: ... He's the reviser : As he searches for a new strategy for Iraq, Bush has now adopted the formula advanced by his top military adviser to describe the situation. "We're not winning, we're not losing," Bush said in an interview with The Washington ...
- Shining Light In Dark Corners: ... in Ethiopia See Premier's Talk of War As Ploy to Tighten Grip (washingtonpost.com - World News and Analysis From The Washington Post) U.S. Not Winning War in Iraq, Bush Says for 1st Time (washingtonpost.com - World News and Analysis From The Washington Post) On the War, Determined to Go His Own Way ...
- Cursor.org - Table of Contents page: ... reports that President Bush, in an interview with the paper, "said he has not yet made a decision about a new strategy for ...
- The Grey Matter: ... now says we're "not winning" in Iraq. But then what about the sh*t storm that erupted when Gates said the exact same thing about two weeks ago?! Tony Snow had to engage ...
The Blog | Sen. Harry Reid: The Clock is Ticking, Mr. President | The Huffington Post
Bob Cesca: Al Gore: The Voice Of Reality, 2006 Merrill Goozner: New GAO Report Debunks Drug Industry Myths Bush Tells Wash Post: "We Do Need To Increase Our Troops"... GOP Rep. Sends Letter On First Muslim In Congress: "If American Citizens Don't Wake Up There Will Likely Be Many More'... Conservative Mag: Gingrich Blames Rove For GOP's Problems... Goldman Sachs Give Chairman $53.4 Million Bonus... "Embarrassing" Leaked Video Sho
(close)Sources linking to this item (24):
- MyDD :: Direct Democracy for People-Powered Politics: ... on the Surge by Chris Bowers, Tue Dec 19, 2006 at 10:42:44 PM EST I assume there will be endless spleen about this post online : Frankly, I don't believe that more troops is the answer for Iraq. It's a civil war and America should not be policing a Sunni-Shia conflict. In addition, we don't have the additional forces to put in there. We obviously ...
- AMERICAblog: A blog for a great nation that deserves the truth: ... we shouldn't send any more by John in DC - 12/19/2006 07:38:00 PM QED Frankly, I don't believe that more troops is the answer for Iraq. It's a civil war and America should not be policing a Sunni-Shia conflict. In addition, we don't have the additional forces to put in there. We obviously want to support ...
- excuse the mess... that was just my head: ... from Reid's typing fingers. The Clock is Ticking, Mr. President Want to know what Senator Reid wants to do? Check it out, he tells us. posted by shayera ...
- CorrenteWire | Ecrasez l'infame!: ... Submitted by shystee on Wed, 2006-12-20 00:10. Dems Who Don't Suck Harry Reid speaks out AGAINST troop increases at HuffPo: Frankly, I don’t believe that more troops is the answer for Iraq. It’s a civil war and America should not be policing a Sunni-Shia conflict. In addition, we don’t have the ...
- Think Progress: ... I do not support escalation. “Frankly, t believe that more troops is the answer for Iraq . It’s a civil war and America should not be policing a Sunni-Shia conflict,” incoming Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) writes. “I do not support an escalation of the conflict. I support finding a way to bring our troops ...
- The Blue Voice: ... sees that Harry Reid is already thinking better of his weekend endorsement of the Bush Surge in Iraq: The Clock is Ticking, Mr. President Huffington Post ...
- Democrat Taylor Marsh Blogs Politics: ... a renewed diplomatic effort and regional strategy. I do not support an escalation of the conflict. I support finding a way to bring our troops home and would look at any plan that gave a roadmap to this goal. The Clock is Ticking, Mr. President From Senators Jack Reed, Kennedy and Clinton to many faithful Democrats, we all let Senator Harry Reid know he'd said something ...
- The Reaction -- by Michael J.W. Stickings: ... trust. Why support him now on something as ludicrously stupid as a troop increase? Well, Reid has issued a clarification of his position at The Huffington Post , and his clarified position does not include support for a troop increase: "Frankly, I don't believe that more troops is the answer for Iraq. It's a civil war and America should not be policing a Sunni-Shia conflict. In addition, we don't have the ...
- Dem Bloggers: ... this is just for a short period of time, we’ll go along with that,” said Reid, D-Nev., citing a time frame such as two months to three months. But a period of 18 months to 24 months would be too long, he said. Today at Huffington Post : "Frankly, I don't believe that more troops is the answer for Iraq. It's a civil war and America should not be policing a Sunni-Shia conflict. In addition, we don't have the additional forces to put in there. We ...
- The Osterley Times: ... December 20, 2006 The Clock is Ticking, Mr. President ...
- The Blue State: ... hard by the blogosphere and the rest of the activist community for helping further the open-ended Republican policy in Iraq. Realizing that he needed to do damage control fast, Reid strategically wrote a short op-ed piece that appeared on the Huffington Post web site. In the column, he took the exact opposite position as the one he took last week: Frankly, I don't believe that more troops is the answer for Iraq. It's a civil war and America should not be policing a ...
- Eschaton: ... to have links open new windows Wednesday, December 20, 2006 Escalation Reid: I do not support an escalation of the conflict. I support finding a way to bring our troops home and would look at any plan that gave a roadmap to this goal. It's been two weeks since the Iraq Study Group released its ...
- RealClearPolitics: ... Babbin: Questions on Surge Harry Reid: The Clock is Ticking Election ...
- The Moderate Voice - -: ... for reciprocal support thereafter. I didn't buy it. Bush has done nothing to earn our trust. Why support him now on something as ludicrously stupid as a troop increase? Well, Reid has issued a clarification of his position at The Huffington Post , and his clarified position does not include support for a troop increase: "Frankly, I don't believe that more troops is the answer for Iraq. It's a civil war and America should not be policing a Sunni-Shia conflict. In addition, we don't have the ...
- The Hotline's Blogometer: ... Musgrave (CO 04), 7. Rick Renzi (AZ 01), 8. John Doolittle (CA 04), 9. Mike Ferguson (NJ 07), 10. Robin Hayes (NC 08). IRAQ: Surge Protector Incoming Senate Maj. Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) took to The Huffington Post 12/19 assuring the blogosphere he doesn't "believe that more troops is the answer for Iraq." Reid then outlines his position on the war: 1. I believe we should start redeploying troops in 4 to 6 months (The Levin-Reed Plan) and ...
- Rook's Rant: ... Point Position The Blog | Sen. Harry Reid: The Clock is Ticking, Mr. President | The Huffington Post Frankly, I don't believe that more troops is the answer for Iraq. It's a civil war and America should not be policing a Sunni-Shia conflict. So, Senator Reid does not support "The Surge." Good for him. He also points ...
- D-Day: ... screen. • I didn't participate in the Harry Reid kerfuffle over what he said on ABC about the "troop surge" because there was a kind of insidious "piling on" aspect to it from the progressive blogosphere. Reid needed the opportunity to explain himself , and he did a good job. Frankly, I don't believe that more troops is the answer for Iraq. It's a civil war and America should not be policing a Sunni-Shia conflict. In addition, we don't have the additional forces to put in ...
- BobGeiger.com: ... needs to put forth a plan as soon as possible, one that reflects the reality on the ground in Iraq and that withdraws our troops from the middle of this deadly civil war. Seems pretty straightforward to me. You can read the rest at the Huffington Post . posted by Bob Geiger ...
- Blog for America » Front » Page 1: ... this is a relief. Senate Majority Leader-elect Harry Reid is clarifying his comment regarding Bush's plan to increase the number of troops in Iraq: Frankly, I don't believe that more troops is the answer for Iraq. It's a civil war and America should not be policing a Sunni-Shia conflict. In addition, ...
- Politics in the Zeros: ... cut off the funding. All else is just hot air and political posturing. Apparently it’s more important to them to get an advantage in the 2008 elections rather than bring the troops home now and end the slaughter. Hence we have a lot of The Clock is Ticking, Mr. President from the Dems, waiting for Bush to make (another) mistake. Wow, how principled the Democrats are, letting more die so they might get a short-term domestic political gain. Meanwhile, insurgents in Iraq ...
- Beltway Blogroll: ... for supportive statements about briefly sending more troops to Iraq. But Bowers' point also could be -- and I think should be -- taken as a profound statement about bloggers in general. UPDATE: Reid revised and extended his remarks at The Huffington Post , and that gave Bowers another news peg to lecture his blogosphere brethren again: Or, maybe, there are elements in the blogosphere who are exactly like the establishment ...
- TPMmuckraker: ... (R-MO) were not returned. As for the Democrats... After initially indicating an openness to the "surge" idea (providing that "it's part of a program to get us out of there"), incoming Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) issued a statement yesterday that he's no longer open: "I don't believe that more troops is the answer for Iraq." The next Majority Whip, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) told reporters this past weekend ...
- The Daily Background: ... troop surges Although incoming Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) initially seemed supportive of a hypothetical troop surge, he later wrote a blog entry for the Huffington Post, clarifying h is earlier statements by saying “ t believe that more troops is the answer for Iraq .” Tuesday December 19th 2006, 7:07 pm by Arlen ...
- BuzzFlash - Daily Headlines and Breaking News: ... Crockett: A Democratic Southern Strategy - Compete! -- A BuzzFlash Guest Contribution Sen. Harry Reid: The Clock is Ticking, Mr. President 12/21 Bush ...
With Recession Looming, Bush Tells America To ‘Go Shopping More’
Today, President Bush held a news conference where he discussed the “way forward” for the economy in 2007. Renowned Morgan Stanley economist Steven Roach says the the “odds of the U.S. economy tipping into recession are about 40 to 45 per cent.” New York Times columnist Paul Krugman notes that “the odds are very good
(close)Sources linking to this item (7):
- D-Day: ... who take their cues from corporate lobbyists. Meanwhile more Americans are robbed, carjacked, assaulted, raped and murdered because funding the kinds of programs necessary to reduce those crimes is not a federal priority. The priority, instead, is to make sure everyone goes shopping . As we work with Congress in the coming year to chart a new course in Iraq and strengthen our military to meet the challenges of the 21st century, we must also work together to achieve important goals for the American people ...
- Economist's View: ... be included as well. So are the expected benefits of increased troop levels high enough to justify both the human and financial costs? I haven't been convinced of that. Not at all. Update: It turns out that Bush does have an economic plan to stimulate the economy and help pay for the troop build-up. From today's news conference: As we work with Congress in the coming year to chart a new course in Iraq and strengthen our military to meet the challenges of the ...
- MotherJones.com | MoJo Blog - Social Issues and Political Commentary: ... for America! (It's a Very GWB Christmas!) In light of George W. Bush's recent instruction that Americans do their part to hold off economic recession by shopping more , Mother Jones brings you a collection of GWB action figures and dolls -- perfect for that unreconstructed hawk or delusional hard-line right-winger on your gift list! First, ...
- Upper Left: ... the Generals. He doesn't care about the Congress, either, or the Constitution. And he certainly doesn't care about you. Seems to have some concerns about commerce , though… // posted by Shaun ...
- BuzzFlash - Daily Headlines and Breaking News: ... Dingell talks to Grist about climate change, fuel economy, and the 110th Congress 12/21 With Recession Looming, Bush Tells America To ‘Go Shopping More’ 12/21 B ...
- Brains and Eggs: ... December 25th at 8PM EST," a Fox News release states. Also, Shoutin' Sean Hannity will host a one-hour special, "A Nashville New Year", starring several of country music's leading Republican freaks. Under the President's directive to "go shopping more" , Orally will no doubt release some casualty figures related to victory, such as ... -- the number of credit card accounts maxed out -- the percentages of parking lot capacities at shopping malls around the country during the ...
- Cursor.org - Table of Contents page: ... Bush, who is said to be "not interested in extraction" from 'The Bunker,' also urged Americans to " go shopping more ," after signing new "tax relief" legislation. Alexander Cockburn repeats his prediction that ...
Congressman Criticizes Election of Muslim
Representative Virgil H. Goode Jr. warned that the election of the first Muslim to Congress posed a threat to the nation’s traditional values.(close)Sources linking to this item (11):
- LiberalOasis: ... Rep. Goode learned nothing about his state from former Senator George "Macaca" Allen.) The "Muslim Representative" -- who has a name, Keith Ellison -- handled this incident pitch perfectly. After noting that he is not an immigrant, but has American ancestry back to the 18th century, he said: I'm looking forward to making friends with Representative Goode, or at least getting to know him. I want to let him know that there’s nothing to fear. The fact that there are many ...
- Newsfare: ... Details Archives Theft by Ex-Adviser Election of Muslim ...
- THE NEWS BLOG: ... Virgil H. Goode Jr., left, said Keith Ellison’s decision to use a Koran in a private swearing in for the House of Representatives was a mistake Congressman Criticizes Election of Muslim By RACHEL L. SWARNS Published: December 21, 2006 WASHINGTON, Dec. 20 — In a letter sent to hundreds of voters this month, Representative Virgil H. Goode Jr., Republican of Virginia, warned that the recent ...
- Lawrence Lessig: ... to Regarding this article in the New York Times about Congressman Goode’s letter to his constituents condemning America’s first Muslim Congressman’s decision to swear his oath on the Koran: Congressman Goode: The Constitution which you studied as ...
- LiberalOasis: ... Rep. Goode learned nothing about his state from former Senator George "Macaca" Allen.) The "Muslim Representative" -- who has a name, Keith Ellison -- handled this incident pitch perfectly. After noting that he is not an immigrant, but has American ancestry back to the 18th century, he said: I'm looking forward to making friends with Representative Goode, or at least getting to know him. I want to let him know that there’s nothing to fear. The fact that there are many ...
- The Moderate Voice - -: ... Threatens Traditional Values by Michael van der Galien The entire affair surrounding the election of a Muslim in U.S. Congress is getting ridiculous . Some people should ask themselves this question every now and then: how will the world perceive this? You can bet on it that this will get attention in the Muslim world (and more generally Muslims worldwide), once they find out about it. More ...
- Liberty Street: ... to preserve the values and beliefs traditional to the United States of America and to prevent our resources from being swamped," said Mr. Goode, who vowed to use the Bible when taking his own oath of office. Mr. Ellison's response was remarkably restrained : Mr. Ellison dismissed Mr. Goode's comments, saying they seemed ill informed about his personal origins as well as about Constitutional protections of religious freedom. "I'm not an immigrant," added Mr. Ellison, who traces ...
- Think Progress: ... I believe are necessary to preserve the values and beliefs traditional to the United States of America and to prevent our resources from being swamped. One problem: Keith Elision is not an immigrant. In fact, his ancestors have been living on the continent for over 250 years , before the United States was established as a country: Mr. Ellison dismissed Mr. Goode’s comments, saying they seemed ill informed about his personal origins as well as about Constitutional protections of religious ...
- No More Mister Nice Blog: ... in the United States if we do not adopt the strict immigration policies that I believe are necessary to preserve the values and beliefs traditional to the United States of America and to prevent our resources from being swamped.... New York Times quotes the response of that congressman-elect, Keith Ellison, regarding his plan to use a Koran in his swearing-in ceremony: Mr. Ellison dismissed Mr. Goode's comments, saying they seemed ill informed about his personal origins as ...
- TPMmuckraker: ... press. He's chosen the friendly environs of Fox News: at 4 P.M. today, he'll appear on Neil Cavuto's show to address the swelling controversy. First reported in Charlottesville's local C-Ville Weekly, the story is now everywhere: The New York Times , CNN, and the AP all had stories out today. Goode has repeatedly refused to apologize ...
- 2Millionth Web Log: ... Or "Fraulein" Debbie Schlussel. UPDATE:not to mention Rep. Vergil 'Carry Me Back to Old Virginia' Goode, R-VA...I'm sure he's a good friend of former Senator Allen . Coincidently, Sadly, No! posted an excerpt from a Richard Hofstadter essay (turned ...
The Advocate - Lamont camp cleared in hacking of Lieberman Web site
The U.S. attorney's office and state attorney general have cleared former U.S. Senate candidate Ned Lamont and his supporters of any role in the crash of U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman's campaign Web site hours before last summer's Democratic primary.
(close)Sources linking to this item (9):
- ConnecticutBLOG: ... and bloggers cleared of DOS attack This is no big surprise. The U.S. attorney's office and state attorney general have cleared former U.S. Senate candidate Ned Lamont and his supporters of any role in the crash of U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman's campaign Web site hours before last summer's ...
- MyDD :: Direct Democracy for People-Powered Politics: ... the site files for study, we were able to add an appropriate one-page maintenance message." As you can see, huge parts of this article were simply direct quotes from Lieberman campaign statements. I bring this up because now, to great fanfare, it turns out that such claims from the Lieberman camp were utterly inaccurate : "The investigation has revealed no evidence the problems the Web site experienced were the result of criminal conduct," said Tom Carson, spokesman for U.S. Attorney Kevin O'Connor. State Attorney General Richard ...
- Crooks and Liars: ... down on the day of the election, we all knew what had happened because—we're bloggers and actually maintain websites. Check out my entries on 08/08/06 that followed the day. s finally official . The U.S. attorney's office and state attorney general have cleared former U.S. Senate candidate Ned Lamont and his supporters of any role in the crash of U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman's campaign Web site hours before last ...
- Taegan Goddard's Political Wire: ... Cleared of Hacking Lieberman Site Connecticut U.S. Senate candidate Ned Lamont was cleared of having any role in the crash of Sen. Joseph Lieberman's campaign website in the hours before last summer's Democratic primary, according to the Stamford Advocate . At the time, Lieberman spokesman Dan Gerstein claimed the campaign "had no electronic communications" because of ...
- The Supreme Irony of Life...: ... Home So Lamont Didn't Hack Lieberman's Website? Who'd a thunk it : The U.S. attorney's office and state attorney general have cleared former U.S. Senate candidate Ned Lamont and his supporters of any role in the crash of U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman's campaign Web site hours before last ...
- Firedoglake - Firedoglake weblog: ... a replacement for Alan Schlesinger, before Karl Rove put out the word that the GOP should not put up any opposition to Lieberman), the FBI and State Attorney General Richard Blumenthal have concluded that the whole "site hack" accusation was pure fabrication with no basis in fact. Spazeboy: It only took four months for them to conclude not ...
- The Carpetbagger Report: ... when Lieberman claimed that his website had been hacked by his rival? The former Dem asked the U.S. attorney’s office to conduct an investigation. Yesterday, the issue was resolved and — surprise, surprise — Lamont and his supporters were cleared . (The accusations got quite a bit of attention at the time; the resolution will probably get less.) * Speaking of Lieberman, how independent is he? So independent that he’s ...
- Wonkette: The D.C. Gossip: ... Daley promises Barack Obama a vote from every single person who died in Chicago since 1930. [Political Insider] Ned Lamont not the elite hax0r you thought he was. [ Stamford Advocate ] read more: chicago, christians, ...
- Connecticut Bob: ... Senator, I was one of those terrible awful bloggers that you so cavalierly accused of hacking your shitless website way back in August. You remember, don't you? The truth is out. Today the Stamford Advocate reported this story. From Blog ...
Welcome to the Blob
In the Blog Mob, or Blob as I shall call it, I am a fool and you are an imbecile. (Who me? Yes, you.) And now that we know about bloggers and their readers, let's find out about the blogs themselves. The blogs are not as significant as their self-endeared curators would like to think. …The larger problem with blogs, it seems to me, is quality. Most of them are pretty awful. Many, even some with large followings, are downright appalling. …Because political blogs are predictable, they are excruciatingly boring.So then, the Blob is comprised of fools and imbeciles congregating around poorly constructed and uninteresting outposts of little significance. Hardly worthy, it would seem, of the Wall Street Journal's assistant editorial features editor dedicating 1,000 words to it. But maybe it was important to clarify for significant
(close)Sources linking to this item (4):
- Dem Bloggers: ... Ed Driscoll.com, Decision '08, Shakespeare's Sister , EU Referendum, Gun Toting Liberal ...
- Liberty Street: ... and so on. With the exception of a few magazines, not much which would give feminism any positive credit and not much which shows some study of the field. For those you have to turn to blogs. Shakespeare's Sister wonders why Rago spilled so much ink on bloggers if he believes we are fools and imbeciles: So then, the Blob is comprised of fools and imbeciles congregating around poorly constructed and uninteresting outposts of little significance. Hardly worthy, it would ...
- ECHIDNE OF THE SNAKES: ... post of mine using a parable to explain why Europeans are annoyed and not too eager to help. As my first choice was taken, I'm going to steal another choice from Shakespeare's Sister and talk about the Blob Mob, subtitled ""Written by fools to be read by imbeciles", by Joseph Rago. Rago works for ...
- First Draft: ... should pass this on to George Will who recently said of blogging "It's about narcissism" and the editors of WSJ who opined today on the fools and imbeciles comprising the “Blog Mob.” I’ll bet anyone who gets their grant and is able to actually start rebuilding yet retain the right to appeal would not characterize CHAT as a Mob of narcisstic imbeciles. It's once again another example of how the wise men of Washington ...
President Bush on Iraq, Elections and Immigration
This 25-minute interview was conducted yesterday in the Oval Office by Washington Post staff writers Peter Baker, Michael A. Fletcher and Michael Abramowitz.
(close)Sources linking to this item (20):
- Crooks and Liars: ... disagreement from the Joint Chiefs of Staff on increasing troop levels, even though "his experts" (to whom he claimed he would listen) are telling him it's just creating more targets, the Washington Post is reporting in an exclusive interview that Bush has ordered Gates to come up with a plan to increase troops. Now, granted, he's hedging on them being in Iraq–but c'mon, we all know where they'll be ...
- LiberalOasis: ... to broaden the debates beyond finer tactical points to deeper strategic goals. It's fine for them to be consistent about troop size and relieving the current stress on our military, but there's no excuse for letting Bush argue we need more troops for an "ideological war." That's a perfect opening to argue it's not the military's job to win hearts and minds. That's a job for politics, diplomacy and economics. Not a bigger military. Posted ...
- LiberalOasis: ... to broaden the debates beyond finer tactical points to deeper strategic goals. It's fine for them to be consistent about troop size and relieving the current stress on our military, but there's no excuse for letting Bush argue we need more troops for an "ideological war." That's a perfect opening to argue it's not the military's job to win hearts and minds. That's a job for politics, diplomacy and economics. Not a bigger military. Posted ...
- Bush Watch Home: ... military to meet the challenges of a long-term global war against terrorists, a response to warnings that sustained deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan have stretched the armed forces to near the breaking point." Post Interview with President Bush , Transcript Excerpt "Bush said he has instructed newly sworn-in Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates to report back to him with a plan to increase ground forces. The president gave no estimates about how many troops may be added but ...
- Bush Watch Home: ... military to meet the challenges of a long-term global war against terrorists, a response to warnings that sustained deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan have stretched the armed forces to near the breaking point." Post Interview with President Bush , Transcript Excerpt "Bush said he has instructed newly sworn-in Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates to report back to him with a plan to increase ground forces. The president gave no estimates about how many troops may be added but ...
- The Road to Surfdom: ... — Ken L @ 8:38 pm Here’s something out of the blue. The Iraq incursion war difficulty thing has yet another label. See if you can spot it in these extracts from the latest interview with Dubya: President Bush: Listen, a couple of things before we get going. Obviously, I’ve been thinking about — and talking to a lot of people about — the way forward in Iraq and the way forward in this ...
- No More Mister Nice Blog: ... December 20, 2006 WHEN YOU USE A WORD, IT MEANS EXACTLY WHAT I CHOOSE IT TO MEAN, NOTHING MORE OR LESS President Bush The Washington Post what the American people are thinking right now -- even if it seems like the exact opposite of what we're thinking: ...I think what the people want is -- they want a couple of things. They want to see Democrats and Republicans work ...
- The Raw Story | A rational voice - Alternative news: ... to seek larger US military Admits we're not winning in Iraq - Read the full interview ...
- PSoTD -: ... December 20, 2006 at 10:07am Capacity to Learn George W. Bush is pushing harder and harder on a point to the American people - he does not have much capacity to learn, particularly from the American people. Whether this is by mental limitation or choice I can't say. But IMHO, he constantly misinterprets the ...
- Shakespeare's Sister: ... Absolutely. We're winning . But winning in Iraq ain't what it used to be. Can we come back to General Pace's formulation about winning, not losing? You said October 24th, "Absolutely, we're winning." And I wanted to -- BUSH: Yes, ...
- Salon.com - Daou Report: ... CRAB BOULEVARD “Are They Going To Leave Us Again?” Bush gave an interview to the Washington Post : In the back of [the Iraqis'] mind, they're saying, "Are they going to leave us again?" And that's an important question for them to have answered, because in order to make difficult choices and to take risk for peace, they're going ...
- The Obfuscation Report: ... capability from current end strength.This “restructuring” was a central part of Rumsfeld’s efforts to make the military a “more modern force.” Bush cited those efforts as a key reason why he believed Rumsfeld was “ one of the finest defense secretaries ” in history. # posted by ...
- Think Progress: ... end strength. This “restructuring” was a central part of Rumsfeld’s efforts to make the military a “more modern force.” Bush cited those efforts as a key reason why he believed Rumsfeld was “ one of the finest defense secretaries ” in history. Digg It! Filed ...
- NDN Blog | NDN Blog: ... but not losing Submitted by Travis Valentine on Wed, 12/20/2006 - 10:37am. Bush / GOP In an interview with reporters from The Washington Post yesterday, President Bush discussed multiple issues ranging from Iraq to his domestic agenda. On Iraq, the President turned to politics by asking if Republicans and Democrats can work together to fix ...
- The Democratic Party: ... capability from current end strength. This “restructuring” was a central part of Rumsfeld’s efforts to make the military a “more modern force.” Bush cited those efforts as a key reason why he believed Rumsfeld was “ one of the finest defense secretaries ” in history. Posted by Tracy Russo at 10:24 AM | Comments ...
- The Carpetbagger Report: ... war, Bush has gone from total confidence that we’re winning, to the equivocating “we’re not winning, we’re not losing.” This is progress? I’m afraid this isn’t impressive. In fact, over the course of 4,000-word interview , the president gave no indication that he has any idea what to do about the nightmare he created. Read more ...
- D-Day: ... the policy, not only stalwart liberals like John Kerry but conservatives like Norm Coleman. If you read this fatuous interview with the President, you see how he's trying to hold his cards. He doesn't want to tell the American people that he's sending more men and women to die while trying to police the middle of a civil war. There's no defined enemy and no defined ...
- Liberty Street: ... four years of this disastrous war, Bush has gone from total confidence that we're winning, to the equivocating "we're not winning, we're not losing.” This is progress? I'm afraid this isn't impressive. In fact, over the course of [a] 4,000-word interview , the president gave no indication that he has any idea what to do about the nightmare he created. Read ...
- 2Millionth Web Log: ... is Moqtada al Sadr. And this is your president's brain . Any ...
- Cursor.org - Table of Contents page: ... Patrol The Washington Post reports that President Bush, in an interview with the paper, "said he has not yet made a decision about a new strategy for Iraq and would wait" for Defense Secretary Gates "to return from a ...
President Confronts Dissent on Troop Levels
The debate over sending more U.S. troops to Iraq intensified yesterday as President Bush signaled that he will listen but not necessarily defer to balky military officers, while Gen. John P. Abizaid, his top Middle East commander and a leading skeptic of a so-called surge, announced his retirement.(close)Sources linking to this item (19):
- The Progressive Daily Beacon: ... Post - December 20th, 2006 Despite Bush's comment yesterday that the U.S. is currently "not winning" in Iraq, he continues to believe that "victory in Iraq is achievable" ... more Progressive Daily Beacon ...
- CorrenteWire | Ecrasez l'infame!: ... (Attorney General) and William Ruckelshaus (Assistant Attorney General) resigned rather than carry out the order. After they did, the acting Attorney General, Robert Bork, did the deed. The past isn’t dead. It isn’t even past.) WaPo : The debate over sending more U.S. troops to Iraq intensified yesterday as President Bush signaled that he will listen but not necessarily defer to balky military officers, while Gen. John P. Abizaid, his top Middle East ...
- BuzzFlash - Daily Headlines and Breaking News: ... DEFAULT It's the Stunted Adolescent -- Bush -- Vs. the Pentagon, Vs. the American People, Vs. Reality. He Should be Removed From Office, Tried, And Given Intensive Psychotherapy in Prison. ...
- Oh Well: A Commentary on News and Politics: ... in Iraq is achievable. It hadn't happened nearly as quickly as I hoped it would have." Would you like another contradiction? How about Bush contradicting what the Pentagon has just reported regarding al Qaeda in Iraq. Here is what Bush said today about al Qaeda in Iraq: Bush said it was important to analyze what has gone wrong in Iraq as he considers options for a new strategy there. He credited a foreign-led radical group affiliated with the al-Qaeda terrorist network with carrying out a ...
- The Reaction -- by Michael J.W. Stickings: ... a "specific mission that can be accomplished" and he is ready to agree on the new escalation strategy? It's only a matter of time, but in the meantime we'll be fed a steady diet of the "reasonable president" rhetorical spin. The WaPo has more . (Cross-posted at State of the Day.) posted by creature ...
- The Raw Story | A rational voice - Alternative news: ... Bush to go own way on troop levels President won't defer to generals; Troops tell Gates they want more in ...
- Liberty Street: ... Hey, you know how the right is always claiming that the MSM has a blatant liberal bias? Well, I think I just found an example! Take a look at this passage in today's WaPo article about Pres. Bush telling the press that he isn't going to let his military commanders decide whether more troops should be sent to Iraq : ... As he prepared to begin his holiday break at Camp David and his ranch in Crawford, Tex., he ruminated in response to questions on the difficulty of wartime leadership but said he harbors no doubts about his decision to ...
- Salon.com - Daou Report: ... BAINBRIDGE The Surge and the JCS The WaPo reports : The tension between the White House and the Joint Chiefs of Staff over the proposed troop increase has come to dominate the administration's post-election search for a new strategy in Iraq.... Suppose the JCS were to strongly break ranks ...
- Wonkette: The D.C. Gossip: ... Briefing: Secrets Out President Bush says victory in Iraq is “achievable” with more troops, will likely be sending them as soon as he can get rid of some whiny-ass Generals. [ WP , ...
- Uncommon Thought Journal: ... Roston, WP, Bush signing statement on US-India nuclear deal erases Congressional restrictions 12/21/06 Baker, WP, President Confronts Dissent on Troop Levels PNW ...
- RealClearPolitics: ... on Iraq Confronts Dissent on Troops ...
- The Left Coaster: ... Bush Flip-Flops On Listening To Military Leaders by Steve Soto Maybe David Gregory can zing Tony Snow with this : Bush has traditionally paid public deference to the generals, saying any decisions on moving U.S. forces in the region would depend on their views. At a Chicago news conference in July, for instance, Bush said he would yield to ...
- Eschaton: ... In the Post: he internal struggle over troop levels in Iraq has exposed a schism between civilian and military leadership 45 months into a war that, at the moment, has no end in sight. Testifying before a Senate committee Nov. 15, Abizaid ...
- 1115.org - West Coast Cap Peelers: ... flunkeys with knowledge thereof have been transferred to whatever passes for Siberia in this time and place. Because one thing is clear. There has been a big fat fire in the region of Bush’s trousers. WaPo tells it well, and needs no help from anyone else: At a Chicago news conference in July, for instance, Bush said he would yield to Gen. George W. Casey Jr., the Iraq commander. “General Casey will ...
- The Supreme Irony of Life...: ... comments have been consistent. So long as he is President, the US will be involved in Iraq. So, with "the Generals" now openly disagreeing with Bush on some strategic issues (more troops, withdraw, etc.) Bush has now made it clear that he no longer feels bound to listen to them : The debate over sending more U.S. troops to Iraq intensified yesterday as President Bush signaled that he will listen but not necessarily defer to balky military officers, while Gen. John P. ...
- NDN Blog | NDN Blog: ... for more). The Times today calls them rudderless. The Post has yet another story about the intense military opposition to the "surge." A must-read Times op-ed today reflects on the Sunni-Shiite struggle, one that once again reminds us how unlikely ...
- AMERICAblog: A blog for a great nation that deserves the truth: ... war - from the number of initial troops sent in, to the their body armor and plan for victory (or lack thereof) - Bush always replied that he was listening to the commanders on the ground and doing whatever they wanted. Now, not so much. From the Washington Post :The debate over sending more U.S. troops to Iraq intensified yesterday as President Bush signaled that he will listen but not necessarily defer to balky military officers.So now, rather than listening to the military ...
- Booman Tribune ~ A Progressive Community: ... through our elected officials, the means to remove a delusional and dangerous administration from power in a peaceful manner. The military knows this. And the military must rely on Congress to do their duty. Our top Middle East commander has just announced his retirement . The Joint Chiefs of Staff are openly disagreeing and defying the President. Republican wise men from Jim Baker to Colin Powell are openly opposed to the President's strategy. What would you have the military do? It is time for people to ...
- Suburban Guerrilla: ... Regime ( at 7:03 am) Shorter George Bush : I’ll listen to the generals - except when they tell me something I don’t want to hear. ...
Bush Asserts That Victory in Iraq Is Still ‘Achievable’
(close)Sources linking to this item (8):
- Newsfare: ... and Britain to Add Ships to Persian Gulf in Signal to Iran Iraq Is Still ?Achievable? ...
- BAGnewsNotes: ... undisguised preoccupation with a troop surge, and his near total regression in his annual year-end press conference yesterday demonstrates the truly fantastic depth of pathology at play. If the first hint of political recovery following the election was the firing of Don Rumsfeld, followed by the blunt, realist assessment of the quagmire by replacement, ...
- Salon.com - Daou Report: ... undisguised preoccupation with a troop surge, and his near total regression in his annual year-end press conference yesterday demonstrates the truly fantastic depth of pathology at play. If the first hint of political recovery following the election was the firing of Don Rumsfeld ... the new Defense Secretary is also a focal point in the reversion to ...
- Rook's Rant: ... Clear Goal Bush Asserts That Victory in Iraq Is Still ‘Achievable’ - New York Times “Victory in Iraq is achievable,” Mr. Bush said, addressing reporters in the ornate Indian Treaty Room across the street from the White House, in a historic office building once used by the Navy. He added, “Our goal remains a free and ...
- Wonkette: The D.C. Gossip: ... victory in Iraq is “achievable” with more troops, will likely be sending them as soon as he can get rid of some whiny-ass Generals. [WP, NYT , LAT] Those Generals, John Abizaid and George Casey, (no ...
- RealClearPolitics: ... Dissent on Troops Asserts Victory Still 'Achievable' ...
- The Democratic Daily: ... a way to pull the plug on this catastrophe and still maintain some kind of semblance of honor and dignity in the world (though I would assert that won’t actually happen until January 20, 2009). And that was the point of s press conference yesterday, where he delusionally jumped from “we’re not winning” to “victory is right around the corner” every other question. It was sad, really, watching the once self-assured cowboy from Texas, twist and choke on ...
- Cursor.org - Table of Contents page: ... in which he explained what "microphone being loud means," President Bush reportedly "showed no indication that he was inclined to change goals or pull out of Iraq." As Baghdad police recover a ...
Schlussel: Should Barack Hussein Obama be president "when we are fighting the war of our lives against Islam"?
In a December 18 column headlined "Barack Hussein Obama: Once a Muslim, Always A Muslim" and posted on her website, right-wing pundit Debbie Schlussel argued that because Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) middle name is Hussein, his late, estranged father was of Muslim descent, and he has shown interest in his father's Kenyan heritage, Obama's "loyalties" must be called into question as he emerges as a possible Democratic presidential candidate. In the column, Schlussel asked: "So, even if he identifies strongly as a Christian ... is a man who Muslims think is a Muslim, who feels some sort of psychological need to prove himself to his absent Muslim father, and who is now moving in the direction of his father's heritage, a man we want as President when we are fighting the war of our lives against Islam? Where will his loyalties
(close)Sources linking to this item (20):
- D-Day: ... wrote earlier today and apply it to something that's happened recently. I really only know Debbie Schlussel from back when she'd come on Howard Stern and they'd make fun of her. This item she wrote on Barack Obama is essentially a 1930's Germany argument. "Once a Jew, always a Jew" was a familiar mantra of the time (it's also part of white supremacist movements in relation to blakc people). Schlussel adapts it to her own personal ...
- excuse the mess... that was just my head: ... 2006 what is wrong with this woman? Schlussel: Should Barack Hussein Obama be president "when we are fighting the war of our lives against Islam"? Normally I'd just dismiss her as insane. But I'm giving up the diagnosing for the new year. What can possibly be the line of thinking that came up with an article like that? She needs a quiet, padded room. Okay, I went back on my ...
- Northwest Progressive Institute: ... Year of Racism Ok, this settles it. 2006, the Year of Racism. (Did Slog first come up with that term? I can't recall, I think they might have. But I'm not going to waste time using Google, that could take minutes.)In a December 18 column headlined "Barack Hussein Obama: Once a Muslim, ...
- Crooks and Liars: ... we are fighting the war of our lives against Islam? Where will his loyalties be? Media Matters has a great round up of our liberal media in action including more on "Schlussey" Filed ...
- Democrat Taylor Marsh Blogs Politics: ... forwarded by the likes of Ed Rogers and other Republicans, if only by cowardly inference, is that Senator Obama may call himself a Christian, but he's actually a Muslim out to do the U.S.A. harm through his masquerade of faith. Debbie Schlussel isn't Atlas Shrugged but she is equally unhinged, though she also is not "Christian," but "Jewish." Her attack on Obama is so prejudice and loaded that the implication and inherent danger of such accusations and ...
- CorrenteWire | Ecrasez l'infame!: ... | Department of How Stupid Do They Think We Are? Throwaway post as I’m off to the airport, but I just want to add this to the list of reasons why it’s silly to back Obama. I’m very sorry to say it, but: A Black man will not be president in this country for a long time yet. How do I know this? Because if you go through all the links at the site ...
- AMERICAblog: A blog for a great nation that deserves the truth: ... US congressman might not be a loyal American because he's a Muslim, the bleep button at CNN somehow got misplaced. This is America, not Nazi Germany. Someone needs to remind MSNBC and the other FOX-wannabe networks of that fact. More from Media Matters . ...
- The Peking Duck: ... all racists and all tyrants. But you have to work hard to earn my hate. For Michelle, all it takes is being a Muslim or a liberal. Or being gentle and kind. Update 2: I see that Michelle's kissin' cousin today has taken anti-Muslim bigotry to shocking new heights (or new lows). Disgusting, despicable, vile and deranged. One of my very favorite bloggers appropriately rips Schlusel a new ...
- The-Goddess: ... Should Barack Hussein Obama be president "when we are fighting the war of our lives against Islam"? Media Matters 'Tis the season to be a BIGOT... First, my cousin is quotd in the AP defending her school's use of the Confederate flag because her "colored friends" (good grief - what year is it?) never object. Never mind that they're only ...
- The Raw Story | A rational voice - Alternative news: ... Pundit questions Sen. Obama's 'loyalties' Due to Muslim ancestry and middle name, 'loyalty must be called into ...
- Orcinus: ... for Osama Why does Debbie Schlussel hate America? In a December 18 column headlined "Barack Hussein Obama: Once a Muslim, Always A Muslim" and posted on her website, right-wing pundit Debbie Schlussel argued that because Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) middle name is Hussein, ...
- The Reaction -- by Michael J.W. Stickings: ... She calls it what it is: bigotry. And see also Media Matters : "Schlussel's column fits into a larger pattern in the recent media coverage and commentary regarding Obama." posted by Michael J.W. ...
- NewsHog: ... traitors, the extreme right under a fanatical sociopathic Vice President declares the President mentally incompetent then imposes martial law to supposedly prevent a liberal/Islamo-terrorist coup . Of course, the "liberal coup" turns out to be a lie (complete with faked terror attacks causing thousands of deaths), just a subterfuge to create a narrative for martial law and a rightwing government in perpetuity. But the ends ...
- PBD - Progressive Blog Digest: ... there nothing they can’t get away with saying? Another member of the blonde bimbo Republican attack squad says that Barack Obama, devout Christian (but with a deceased father of Muslim descent) is too dangerous for America http://mediamatters.org/items/200612200005 [Debbie Schlussel] "So, even if he identifies strongly as a Christian ... is a man who Muslims think is a Muslim, who feels some sort of psychological need to prove himself to his absent Muslim father, and who is now moving in the direction of ...
- THE FULCRUM: ... mere fact that she's kept such a Nazi sounding name while living in our great country means that she must have some fondness for her Nazi ancestors. Doesn't that call her loyalties to America into question? The questions are only fair . // posted by Charles2 @ 8:41 AM // ...
- 2Millionth Web Log: ... to ourselves. These days, it's not even BEING foreign that turns wingnuttia all atwitter--merely being "not sufficiently 'Merikun" is often enough. Witness Glenn Beck, for instance. Or "Fraulein" Debbie Schlussel . Coincidently, Sadly, No! posted an excerpt from a Richard Hofstadter essay (turned ...
- Eschaton: ... Barack Obama has Muslim genes, which means he might try to destroy America. Or something. Schlussel, of course, is a fairly regular contributor to our mainstream media discourse, appearing on Fox and MSNBC multiple times over the past year. The ...
- Cursor.org - Table of Contents page: ... although another 14 percent "said the name sounded familiar ." Turkmenbashi the Late The death of Saparmurat Niyazov, ...
- Southpaw: ... nothing to fear but fear itself." —Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1933 December 21, 2006 GOP Fears Now Include Ears and Middle Names This catalog of recent attacks on Barack Hussein Obama on the basis of his name says everything you need to know about intellectually bankrupt conservativism. The Rosie vs. Trump ...
- folkbum's rambles and rants: ... down to anti-Muslim bigotry . (It's a different link this time; it's about ...
Reality check: 95 percent of Americans had premarital sex
More than nine out of 10 Americans, men and women alike, have had premarital sex, according to a new study. The high rates extend even to women born in the 1940s, challenging perceptions that people were more chaste in the past.(close)Sources linking to this item (15):
- Phronesisaical: ... We're All French Now More than nine out of 10 Americans, men and women alike, have had premarital sex, according to a new study. The high rates extend even to women born in the 1940s, ...
- The Raw Story | A rational voice - Alternative news: ... Links '95%' in US have had premarital sex 'Reality-check research'; Waiting until marriage 'extremely ...
- TBogg - "...a somewhat popular blogger": ... guys stayed out of the 5% by paying for it People be boinking :More than nine out of 10 Americans, men and women alike, have had premarital sex, according to a new study. The high rates extend even to women born in the 1940s, challenging perceptions that people were ...
- Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs: ... Study: 95% of Americans Had Premarital Sex (24 comments) ...
- BlondeSense: ... Check So if 95% of Americans have had premarital sex , whose big idea is it to fund abstinence only education and who the hell do they think they're kidding? This is nothing new either. I wish someone would just cut the crap already. In the past 10 years though, the self-reported practice ...
- Shakespeare's Sister: ... read with interest the recent (totally unsurprising) revelations that pot is America's biggest cash crop and 95% of Americans have has premarital sex . It occurs to me the two stories are intimately related by their efficient subversion of the "conventional wisdom" regularly disgorged by fighters of two of America's favorite Wars-On—the oft-referenced War on Drugs and the rarely name-dropped ...
- Bring it On!: ... done so before marriage. Finer said the likelihood of Americans having sex before marriage has remained stable since the 1950s, though people now wait longer to get married and thus are sexually active as singles for extensive periods. — CNN Read the rest of this post » Posted ...
- Proudly letting my freak flag fly since 1970: ... '95%' in US have had premarital sex IN YOUR FACE, James Dobson, Pat Robertson, Rod Parsley, Donald Wildmon, Tony Perkins, Robert Tilton, Jerry Falwell, Tim & Beverly LaHaye, Kirk Cameron, Bill Donohue, and the rest of you stupid assholes who use your false ass ...
- Tennessee Guerilla Women: ... America will not be surprised to learn that the War on Sex is going the same way as the War on Drugs. Marijuana is America's biggest cash crop, and 95 percent of Americans have had premarital sex. Unlike smoking pot, engaging in sex without a government issued license does not always put you at risk of a prison sentence, but that ...
- Pandagon: ... Sex A reality check indeed . Does this mean that — gasp — most of these moralizing fundies have been lying and were boinking like bunnies?! I’m simply astonished that the horizontal bop has been occurring outside the bonds of holy, ...
- aTypical Joe: A gay New Yorker living in the rural South: ... Joe Reality Check: 95% of Americans had premarital sex My parents conceived me that way. And I'm in my 50s so that was well before the sexual revolution. CNN : More than nine out of 10 Americans, men and women alike, have had premarital sex, according to a new study. The high rates extend even to women born in the 1940s, challenging perceptions that people were more chaste in the ...
- ECHIDNE OF THE SNAKES: ... and families at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and also incidentally the guy who believes that what makes a family is a father) now pretends that the abstinence-for-adults program has nothing to do with feeding the wingnuts their daily quota of raw meat : Wade Horn, assistant secretary for children and families at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, defended the abstinence-only approach for teenagers. "One of its values is to help young people ...
- No Capital: ... Check I'm sure that this will have no effect on the faith-based communities approach to these matters: More than nine out of 10 Americans, men and women alike, have had premarital sex, according to a new study. The high rates extend even to women born in the 1940s, ...
- AngryBlackBitch: ... quizzical regarding sex... If premarital sex is normal ... Pause. …so most Americans get their groove on before marriage (assuming that ...
- Eccentricity: ... Were They Thinking I read an article about a survey that surprised researchers, that concluded 95 percent of Americans surveyed had premarital sex . What were they thinking? Women born in the 1940's were maturing sufficiently right about at the time when the birth control pill became available. Women born in the 1940's were likely at the spearhead of what was called "the ...
Crooks and Liars » Scarborough Sees The Light—Barnicle: “Bush is delusional”
Enter your email address: Delivered by FeedBurner Search December M T W T F
(close)Sources linking to this item (6):
- The Huffington Post: ... crooksandliars.com This War?”... QUICK ...
- The Left Coaster: ... Introduces The I-word by Steve Soto Image courtesy of Crooks and Liars It's a 14-minute clip, but you have to watch Scarborough's segment last night on Bush's flip-flop and his apparent isolation/detachmnent on the issue of adding troops in Iraq against the advice of the generals, against the wishes of the Iraqis themselves, and with public support of only 12%. Scarborough and his panelists ...
- Salon.com - Daou Report: ... Escalation: Bush Can't Kick the Habit ' /> Scarborough: “How Can This President Thumb His Nose At The Very Military Leaders Who Are Fighting This War?” Muslim-Fearing GOP Rep to go on Fox ...
- BuzzFlash - Daily Headlines and Breaking News: ... Bonehead and America's Stellar Press 12/22 Scarborough Sees The Light—Barnicle: "Bush is delusional" 12/22 2006: A Year of Living Dangerously ...
- The Stakeholder :: Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee: ... Posted by jesselee Thursday, December 21, 2006 at 11:20 AM Not very happy with President Bush. ...
- The Carpetbagger Report: ... on to describe a Nixon-like figure. “I think you have a president totally isolated from reality, totally delusional, kind of paranoid, figuring that everyone’s against him, including his own Joint Chiefs of Staff.” C&L has the clip . I wonder how common this kind of perspective is around dinner table across the ...
Hullabaloo
Dear Santa by digby Last year I asked my readers to put a little change in the kitty if they had it to spare and many of you did. It was a wonderful affirmation of what I do and I'm still basking in its glow. Well, it's that time of the year again, and while we are all counting our blessings and fighting the war on Christmas and freedom, I'm here once again, stocking in hand, to ask that
(close)Sources linking to this item (19):
- Firedoglake - Firedoglake weblog: ... pm Digby is having a fundraiser over at Hullaballu. Do yourself and the world a favor by keeping the doors open over there and contribute to the support of one of the finest voices in the blogosphere. Carry ...
- Musings: ... has a story in today’s NY Times about the return of “Postcards from... Digby's Hullabaloo Untitled Dear Santa by digby Last year I asked my readers to put a little change in the kitty if ...
- GOTV: ... Santa Please send Digby some Christmas cheer. posted by Alice Marshall ...
What's cooking on progressive blogs